Tuesday, December 6, 2016

China Has Built the Biggest and Baddest Conventional Submarine in the World

In 2010, China’s first—and only, so far—Qing-class submarine sailed out to sea following nearly six years of construction. Displacing 6,628 tons submerged and measuring exactly the length of a football field at one hundred yards long (ninety-two meters), it is by most accounts the largest diesel submarine ever built.
Unlike the vast majority of diesel submarines, the Type 032 can fire not only long-range cruise missiles, but submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) with the capacity to send a nuclear warhead across the ocean.
Beijing prefers to keep its cards close to the chest, leading to speculation about the Type 032—is it purely a missile testing submarine, as is officially claimed, or is it the precursor of a fleet of low-cost ballistic-missile subs? Or was the Type 32 actually built as a prototype vessel for export to Pakistan?
In the past, nuclear submarines enjoyed an enormous advantage in submerged endurance and noise compared to traditional diesel submarines. A diesel submarine could swim quietly for days before having to resurface, but a nuclear-powered submarine can do it for months.
That China would even consider developing such a large diesel submarine is due to the advent of Air-Independent Propulsion (AIP) systems, which encompass a variety of technologies that allow engines and generators onboard a submarine to operate while consuming little or no oxygen. AIP systems can be even quieter than the reactors onboard nuclear submarines, and can efficiently propel the ship electrically for weeks, albeit only at slower speeds.
The first operational AIP powered submarine was the Swedish Gotland, which entered service in 1996. Using a Stirling engine, it could operate submerged for thirty days at a time. The small and nearly silent diesel sub successfully penetrated the antisubmarine defenses of U.S. aircraft carrier task forces in several war games.
Since then, China has built fifteen Yuan-class Type 039A (aka Type 041) diesel submarines using Stirling AIP technology, with another twenty planned. The torpedo-armed Yuan-class subs are intended, like the Swedish Gotland, to serve as stealthy short-range boats for stalking enemy vessels in coastal waters.
The Stirling-powered Qing class, however, marks a dramatic departure from that modus operandi. Situated on the vessel’s elongated sail are two or three Vertical Launch Systems (VLS) tubes used to fire JL-2A Ju Lang (“Big Wave”) ballistic missiles. The JL-2A is believed to have a range approaching five thousand miles and can carry a single one-megaton nuclear warhead, or three or four ninety-kiloton independent reentry vehicles (MIRVs).
The JL-2 was first tested in 2001 and constitutes the main armament of China’s Type 094 Jin-class nuclear submarines. A Type 094 sub embarked on China’s first nuclear deterrence patrol in 2015. Hypothetically, the Type 032 would offer a cheaper, shorter-endurance compliment to the Type-094.
Four or five additional VLS cells on the Qing class’s bow can fire JL-18B Yingji(Eagle Strike) antishipping cruise missiles, which surge to speeds of Mach 2.5 on their terminal approach. The JL-18B is supposedly satellite guided, and is variously credited with a range of 110 to more than three hundred miles. The Type 032 can also launch the slower but longer-range CJ-20A cruise missiles, a derivative of the CJ-10.
Rounding out the Qing class’s armaments is an unconventional pairing of a single standard 533-millimeter torpedo tube with an extra-large 650-millimeter tube. The Type 032 also has facilities to accommodate and deploy up to fifty special-forces personnel—an increasingly common feature in modern submarines.
In other respects, the Type 032 is less impressive. It’s slow—with a maximum speed of sixteen miles per hour submerged, nearly half the speed of a Virginia-class nuclear-powered attack submarine. Its maximum dive depth is reported to be 160 to 200 meters—again, less than half the depth that many modern designs can submerge. The Qing class is understandably not designed for a knife-fight.
In any case, the fact that only a single Type 032 has been built reinforces the claims that it is intended as an affordable testing platform for missile armament. It indeed appears to have replaced the sixties-era Type 031 Golf-class sub used to test the JL-2 ballistic missile. In addition to its crew complement of eighty-eight, it claimed that the Type 032 can carry an additional one hundred “scientists and technicians.” The sub has also reportedly been used to test submarine-launched surface-to-air Missiles and a new underwater escape pods. Some suggest the Type 032 may be applied to deploying undersea drones.
However, a 2011 report claimed that China would sell six Type 032 submarines to Pakistan. The two countries hold a long-time alliance opposing India. China remains wary of the potential future superpower, and sees reinforcing its archrival Pakistan as a strategic hedge. However, the initial claim to a Type 032 deal was either inaccurate or fell through.
More recently, Beijing confirmed in October that it would sell eight Project S-26 and Project S-30 submarines for $4–5 billion—a price roughly equivalent to the cost of two nuclear submarines. Four of each subtype will be constructed in China and Karachi, Pakistan, with first delivery no sooner than 2020 and completion of the contract by 2028.
However, it’s unclear what type of submarines these will turn out to be. Several of official reports appear to state that these are derivatives of the Type 032, but most experts believe they are instead down-scaled version of the ship-huntingYuan-class submarine. However, some descriptions of the S-30 imply it is based on the Type 032, with an intended armament of four Pakistani-developed Babur nuclear-capable land-attack cruise missiles as well as retaining two SLBM tubes.
Nuclear submarines still possess advantages over AIP-powered diesel submarines. Deterrence patrols tend to be lengthy, so the three-to-four-month endurance of nuclear subs still handily beats the thirty days of a Stirling-powered sub. And even though the ability to remain underwater for months at a time may be less vital for coastal defense subs, nuclear submarines can also sustain higher underwater speeds over long distances.
Still, most navies across the world aren’t like United States, which operates submarines thousands of miles across the length of the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Countries like China, Pakistan or, hypothetically, Iran or Saudi Arabia, have naval security interests closer to home and don’t need their submarines to cross vast oceans.
Particularly for countries like Pakistan with access to nuclear arms, a missile-armed diesel submarine could offer an affordable means to threaten nuclear retaliation that would remain very difficult to counter, potentially starting a new worrisome trend in nuclear proliferation.
Sébastien Roblin holds a Master’s Degree in Conflict Resolution from Georgetown University and served as a university instructor for the Peace Corps in China. He has also worked in education, editing, and refugee resettlement in France and the United States. He currently writes on security and military history for War Is Boring.

Ashraf Ghani embraces Pakistan's enemy, but it will come at a cost.

Afghanistan President Ashraf Ghani played in the hands of his host at Amritsar; he lambasted Pakistan, he attacked the country. Alas, Kabul’s dilemma has never been lack of wealth but dearth of statesmen; thus the man from the Heart of Asia spoke India’s mind.

For the Karzais, Ghanis and Abdullahs of Afghanistan, the country is a podium and a goldmine. For much of the Afghan politicians and their Indian patrons, Afghan history is either 5000 years old or began right with the events of 9/11. Where were these politicians when the Soviets backed by India launched a full-scale occupation using every resource from brute air power to deadly land forces?
Ashraf Ghani left Afghanistan in 1977 for Denmark and eventually the US. The man returned to Kabul in December 2001 to become Hamid Karzai’s top financial advisor. Mariam Ghani, the Afghan president’s daughter, still resides in the US, her birthplace. She occasionally visits Kabul, perhaps to keep connections and funding alive for her activism. His son, Tarek Ghani is a postdoctoral fellow at the Woodrow Wilson School at the Princeton University.
Dr Abdullah Abdullah remained conveniently aligned with Kabul’s puppet regime albeit for a brief period of one year – 1985 to 1986 – when he moved to Peshawar and worked in a hospital. Come early 1990s, he became the right-hand of fellow Tajik warlord Ahmad Shah Masud. He survived in Kabul’s power circles till 1996 when Taliban took over the Afghan capital. Abdullah held the foreign ministry portfolio from 2001 to 2005. According to Anis Daily newspaper, Abdullah’s wife Fakhria lives in India with her four school-going children.
Both the leaders at the helm have little idea of the suffering an average Afghan withstood during the Soviet invasion, Taliban’s takeover and the suffering endured under the NATO. Like Modi, their best bet seems changing geography by adversely and irreparably damaging Pakistan. The Indian leaders’ perverse ambition aims at bringing ever more chaos along Afghanistan’s bordering regions than any respite from its own volcanic faultlines. Islamabad, meanwhile, has corrected its course by not only essentially eliminating Taliban and al-Qaeda sanctuaries in its tribal regions and elsewhere but also ensuring improved surveillance and management of its western border, which remain overwhelmingly un-secured from the Afghan side. As much as Pakistan did, it did so to deny militant movement into the war-ravaged country but also to secure its own territory of foreign proxies and miscreants. For Pakistan’s security and development, a peaceful and prosperous Afghanistan is undoubtedly a key pre-requisite.
How far has Afghanistan come since Bonn conference in 2002 when the comity of nations began the process of facilitating its transition from pariah to a mainstream nation-state? The challenge faced then still confronts the world. What can be done for the land-locked, tribally and racially-divided country?
Taliban are resurging, not along the Pakistan-bordering eastern provinces but in the centre, the north and the west. The Afghan troops and police have failed to stem desertions. The tribal elders are refusing to pay state taxes and embrace mainstream economy. Pakistan has nothing to do with the dares listed above. Yet, Ghani and Abdullah prefer travelling more often to the foreign capitals than their country’s provincial headquarters.
Embracing India’s clandestine foreign policy goals of disrupting peace in Balochistan and branding Pakistan as a terrorist state risk peace and development in Afghanistan whose citizens are no less desperate to escape to Europe than the displaced Syrians and Yemenis. The Afghans won’t have the luxury of foreign financial assistance as enjoyed since 2001 for the donor fatigue is only worsening with mounting humanitarian crises in the Middle East and North Africa. Certainly, the Heart of Asia offers Afghanistan last firm prospect to get the best of friendly assistance in realms of security, reconstruction and development. Unless Afghans place a true statesman at the helm in Kabul, Ajit Doval – Modi’s National Security Advisor – may realise his alleged dream to “fight Pakistan to the last Afghan”.
Naveed Ahmad is a Pakistani investigative journalist and academic with extensive reporting experience in the Middle East and North Africa. He is based in Doha and Istanbul. He tweets @naveed360

The most Googled products and services for sale in every country, in one map



In popular culture, certain countries are stereotypically associated with certain products — beer in Germany, carpets in Turkey, electronics in Japan.
But those things aren't what people are really searching for.
Cost-estimating website Fixr.com put together a map of the world with the most-Googled-for object in each country, using the autocomplete formula of "How much does * cost in [x country]."
While the results are far from scientific — since Google autocomplete results vary based on the searcher's history, the time of search, and the place of search — they do say at least a little bit about how countries are perceived.
The 25 richest, healthiest, happiest, and most advanced countries in the world
Some of the fascinating — and troubling — results:
• People want to know how much a flight in a MIG aircraft costs in Russia.
• People want to know how much a prostitute costs in Brazil.
• People want to know how much rhinoplasty costs in South Korea.
Here are the maps:
world1-map-google-words.png
(Fixr.com)

africa-1-1.png
(Fixr.com)

asia-1.png
(Fixr.com)

europe-1-1.png
(Fixr.com)

south-america-1-1.png
(Fixr.com)

north-america-2-1.png
(Fixr.com)
australia-1-1.png
(Fixr.com)
antartica-1.png
(Fixr.com)

NATO officers from Turkey have turned into stateless asylum-seekers

The Erdogan regime is targeting its own NATO personnel, accusing high-ranking Turkish officers of being coup plotters, ordering them to return home. An exclusive report by DW's Teri Schultz.
Nato Logo (Imago)
Dozens of high-ranking Turkish military officers formerly posted at NATO headquarters in Brussels and SHAPE military headquarters in Mons are among more than 125,000 people President Recep Tayyip Erdogan alleges helped launch a failed coup against him in July.  Erdogan calls them "terrorist soldiers."
Several of these officers agreed to speak with Deutsche Welle under cover of anonymity.
They want to know if any visiting dignitary is going to ask Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu for details on what's happening to them, how he'll reassure them the alliance that it can get along just fine without some of its best-trained specialists.

DW RECOMMENDS

Turkey's NATO officials seek asylum in Germany amid Erdogan crackdown

The majority of Turkish officials, reported to be military employees at NATO bases in Germany, have refused to return to Ankara despite orders. Berlin is now assessing the best way forward "with great care." (17.11.2016)

Opinion: End Turkey EU membership talks once and for all

They are mostly Western-educated, some with PhDs and multiple master's degrees from American universities and institutions, with many NATO exercises under their belts.  All say they had nothing to do with the attempted overthrow of the Erdogan government, that they denounced it immediately and continued working as loyal military representatives of the Turkish government. Yet one by one, their names showed up on one of almost 20 lists of suspects that have been circulated by Ankara to Turkey's missions abroad, usually late on Fridays.
In cover letters attached to those lists, the officers say, they were given instructions to turn in their NATO passes and diplomatic passports, told they are eligible now only for an identity document that goes one way -- back to Ankara. And most were ordered to do that within three days of being notified; some even sooner.  No charges were given, simply lists of names, ranks and services and the information that they had been suspended or fired.
"The showdown for control of Turkey’s military" https://www.aei.org/publication/the-showdown-for-control-of-turkeys-military/  @AEIfdp    
Photo published for The showdown for control of Turkey’s military - AEI

The showdown for control of Turkey’s military - AEI

Turkey's President Erdogan has killed democracy, the free press, and the independence of the judiciary. Now it is Turkey’s military’s turn for ruin.
In the beginning, one officer says, he and others were planning to obey the orders. "Our first reaction was to go back and defend ourselves as we were innocent of any anti-government activity," he told DW. "We said goodbye to our colleagues at NATO," presuming that, after lifelong stellar careers in the military, they could go clear their names quickly and return to their posts at NATO. 
"Then we heard that 17 of our colleagues who did return had been arrested," he said. "So we thought it would be better to wait."
Families warned to stay in Belgium
One Brussels-based officer was not on any list, so when he was summoned to a meeting in Ankara, he decided to go.  A refusal, he feared, would make him look suspicious. That was six weeks ago.
Since then his wife has not seen him or talked to him.  Speaking sadly as her youngest children play nearby, she explained how she frantically tried to get information from the Turkish military representative at NATO when her husband didn't return and she couldn't reach him by phone. Finally she got word of what happened through the wife of someone who saw him arrested after a meeting at government offices in Ankara, but there's been no official explanation to this day.
Her husband's salary was cut off when he disappeared; she has no way to support their three children long-term. Her father-in-law in Turkey was finally able to visit her husband in prison. His message to her: Stay in Belgium.
: "Torture & other forms of ill-treatment seem to have been widespread in days & weeks following failed coup" http://ow.ly/rgtb306KmZ1 
But even that has its risks. The officers say President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has threatened that those who do not obey orders to return home will be hunted down.  Most haven't received salaries since September, so they are living off savings, selling cars and other belongings.  They have moved into smaller apartments, both because they need to save money and so that the government won't know their addresses. Some have requested political asylum in Belgium; counterparts have done the same at Ramstein Air Base in Germany.
One officer wrote about this in a goodbye letter to his NATO colleagues that he called the "silent scream of a Turkish officer." He shared the letter with DW.
"Like my other Turkish colleagues, my dismissal does not mean only losing my job. I have almost lost all my military IDs, passport, social rights, health coverage, bank accounts, retirement pension, working rights etc… And more sadly, I am left by myself without any past and unfortunately without any future. But now, I think that we - the Turkish people - have lost the values of respect for human dignity, liberty, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights. My individual losses are nothing compared with my country's losses."
Losses are also being felt by non-Turkish NATO military officers who worked with the purged staff.  One told DW that the quality of the personnel being sent as replacements by the Turkish government is not up to NATO standards. That individual, who declined to be named, said he felt very uncomfortable with Turkey's apparent flouting its treaty obligations of following the rule of law and respecting basic human rights.
NATO cautious in dealing with Turkey
But evidently Turkey is too important an ally to rock the boat very hard. NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, who's now been asked repeatedly about the situation, says only that these concerns have been "raised" with the Turkish government, not whether he's been sufficiently reassured by the answers. 
 SG: I was told v clearly in Istanbul that withdrawn military officers will be replaced. Turkey has shown clear commitment to NATO. 🇹🇷
The United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture, Nils Melzer, was not impressed on a fact-finding trip last week, calling out the regime for the ferocity of its crackdown on people from all walks of life. Melzer said there has been an "environment conducive to torture" created in the prisons where thousands of purged citizens are being held.
But in Brussels Monday, U.S. Ambassador Doug Lute explained that "rather than dictating standards" to the Turkish government, NATO and the US have decided to "express confidence" in it. "We have a common set of values; they're in the preamble to the Washington Treaty," Lute reminded.  "We expect all 28 allies will abide by those standards because not only do they have a treaty obligation to others, it's in their own self-interest."
One Turkish officer said sadly that with attitudes like this, he feels sold out, both by his own government and by NATO. Another added the reminder that an alliance is only as strong as its weakest member, and they feel that the country with the second-largest army is now that weakest link.

UK lags behind in global school rankings





The UK is still lagging behind leading countries at education and has made little progress in international rankings since results three years ago.

The influential Pisa rankings, run by the OECD, are based on tests taken by 15-year-olds in over 70 countries.

The UK is behind top performers such as Singapore and Finland, but also trails Vietnam, Poland and Estonia.

The OECD's education director, Andreas Schleicher, describes the UK's results as "flat in a changing world".
In maths, the UK is ranked 27th, slipping down a place from three years ago, the lowest since it began participating in the Pisa tests in 2000
In reading, the UK is ranked 22nd, up from 23rd, having fallen out of the top 20 in 2006
The UK's most successful subject is science, up from 21st to 15th place - the highest placing since 2006, although the test score has declined

After the last round of rankings, published in 2013, there were warnings from ministers in England that results were "stagnating" - and reforms were promised to match international rivals.

But Russell Hobby, leader of the National Association of Head Teachers, warned that the results showed "a lost decade" in which the government had pursued an "obsession" with structural change which had "little impact on either standards or equity".

Nick Gibb, England's School Standards Minister, described the results as a "useful insight" and showed the need to "make more good school places available" in grammar schools.

He announced £12m to support professional training for science teaching.

But Professor Stephen Gorard from Durham University said the evidence of the results did not support claims that academic selection would boost overall performance.

What is Pisa? In three sentences

The Programme for International Student Assessment (Pisa) provides education rankings based on international tests taken by 15-year-olds in maths, reading and science.

The tests, run by the OECD and taken every three years, have become increasingly influential on politicians who see their countries and their policies being measured against these global school league tables.

The UK has remained among the mid-table performers, with Singapore rated at the top and most of the highest places taken by Asian education systems.


Within the devolved UK education systems, Wales had the lowest results at every subject.

Mr Schleicher said reforms in Wales had yet to make an impact and it was too early see if they would be successful.

At present Wales' performance in reading puts it only a few places above parts of the UAE, Argentina and Colombia.


Education Secretary Kirsty Williams said: "We can all agree we are not yet where we want to be."

But she said that "hard work is underway" to make improvements in Wales - and that it was important to "stay the course".

Dylan William, of the UCL Institute of Education, urged caution on the results for Wales - saying changes took a long time to filter through and it could be another decade before rankings would reflect what was happening in today's classrooms.

England had the strongest results in the UK, but compared with previous years, Mr Schleicher said "performance hasn't moved at all".


The OECD education chief highlighted concerns about the impact of teacher shortages - saying that an education system could never exceed the quality of its teachers.

"There is clearly a perceived shortage," he said, warning that head teachers saw a teacher shortage as "a major bottleneck" to raising standards.

The National Union of Teachers said the Pisa survey showed the "government is failing in one of its key responsibilities - to ensure that there are enough teachers in the system".

Scotland trails behind England and Northern Ireland - recording its worst results in these Pisa rankings.

Deputy First Minister John Swinney said the "results underline the case for radical reform of Scotland's education system".Image copyrightPAImage captionThe UK's test results remain behind the top-performing Asian education systems

He said he would push for reforms to improve schools "no matter how controversial".

Northern Ireland is behind England, but ahead of Scotland and Wales.

Education minister Peter Weir said "performance has not shown any significant improvement" but he wanted to understand how these results for secondary schools could be explained when another set of results had shown Northern Ireland's primary pupils among the highest achievers for maths.Image copyrightNTUImage captionSingapore has been ranked as having the highest-achieving schools

But the overall highest performer is Singapore, with the Asian country coming top in science, maths and reading.

At the top of the table, Singapore has replaced Shanghai as the highest-ranked education system.

Shanghai no longer appears as a separate entry, with the city's results now part of a wider set of four Chinese regions.

This entry for China is in the top 10 for maths and science, but not in the top 20 for reading.

The education systems in Hong Kong and Macao are also among the highest achievers.Image captionAndreas Schleicher says heads see a teacher shortage as a "bottleneck" to raising standards

Along with regular high achievers such as Singapore, Finland, Hong Kong and Japan, there are strong performances from Estonia, Canada and Vietnam.

But the upper reaches of the rankings are dominated by East Asian countries, with Finland, Estonia and Ireland the only non-Asian countries to get into any of the top fives.

Ty Goddard, of the Education Foundation, said the results for the UK were an "important snapshot of education achievement" - and they should not be used as an "excuse to have a national 'bash a teacher' day".

Brett Wigdortz, chief executive of Teach First, said: "It's very much a 'must try harder' for the UK. We're doing slightly better than the average, but our score has hardly moved compared to three years ago."

So why is Singapore so successful at education?

Singapore only became an independent country in 1965.

And while in the UK the Beatles were singing We Can Work It Out, in Singapore they were really having to work it out, as this new nation had a poor, unskilled, mostly illiterate workforce.Image copyrightNTU SINGAPOREImage captionSingapore made a priority of recruiting top graduates into teaching

The small Asian country focused relentlessly on education as a way of developing its economy and raising living standards.

And from being among the world's poorest, with a mix of ethnicities, religions and languages, Singapore has overtaken the wealthiest countries in Europe, North America and Asia to become the number one in education.

Prof Sing Kong Lee, vice-president of Nanyang Technological University, which houses Singapore's National Institute of Education, said a key factor had been the standard of teaching.

"Singapore invested heavily in a quality teaching force - to raise up the prestige and status of teaching and to attract the best graduates," said Prof Lee.

The country recruits its teachers from the top 5% of graduates in a system that is highly centralised.

All teachers are trained at the National Institute of Education, and Prof Lee said this single route ensured quality control and that all new teachers could "confidently go through to the classroom".

This had to be a consistent, long-term approach, sustained over decades, said Prof Lee. Education was an "eco-system", he said, and "you can't change one part in isolation".

‘Guitgun’: Is it a shotgun or a guitar? Both!

‘Trump overestimates US power’: China fires back in harsh editorial

President-elect Donald Trump’s recent breaking of protocol with Taiwan – followed by brazen tweets directed at China – have led to Beijing’s state-run Global Times issuing a scathing criticism of him, shunning their formerly measured approach to the US.
Trump stirred outrage last week when he made a phone call out of order to Taiwanese leader Tsai Ing-wen, whom China does not recognize as official. This angered Beijing, and spurred Trump to tweet out a series of messages taking issue with Chinese trade policy in response – as well as wondering why he can’t hold a phone call with the Taiwanese leader when the US already openly sells it weapons.

A new editorial in the Global Times, a tabloid branch of the Communist Party-owned People's Daily newspaper to strike back at the president-elect, questioning his intentions toward Beijing.
“It is uncertain whether Trump went up against China because he had been irritated by some chiding comments on his receiving a phone call from Taiwan leader Tsai Ing-wen, or this was a shrewd step in a well-considered China policy. Anyhow, his response is unexpected,” the editorial read.
The authors also wonder if the “unpredictable” Trump is suddenly no longer as isolationist as he made out to be, and whether he was spurred on by an outside force to take a tough line with China, whom he earlier also accused in a tweet of “[devaluing] US currency” and building “a massive military complex” on a disputed island in the South China Sea.

But Beijing’s main point here is that Trump will have to defer to China – because it's the stronger player, economically.“No matter what the reasons are behind Trump's outrageous remarks, it appears inevitable that Sino-US ties will witness more troubles in his early time in the White House than any other predecessor. We must be fully prepared, both mentally and physically, for this scenario.”
“Trump can make a lot of noise but that does not exempt him from the rules of the major power game,” the Global Times writes. “He doesn't have sufficient resources to deal with China wantonly, the second largest economy, the biggest trading country and a nuclear power. His many words will not become deeds. What's more, except for some political radicals, most US people won't want to take the risk of sinking into a major-power conflict.”
There follows a suggestion that all the newfound power is going to Trump's head.
“Trump's reckless remarks against a major power show his lack of experience in diplomacy. He may have overestimated the power of the US. He may have already been obsessed with the power he is about to have a grip on… He may also believe that if China, the biggest power after the US, is awed by Washington, it will solve all other problems.”
The editorial then promises that China will adapt to the new challenges of a Trump presidency, and “must be determined to upset his unreasonable requests at his early time in office, and fight back if his moves harm China’s interests, regardless of the consequences to the dynamics of the Sino-US relationship.”

Ignoring the potential minefield, Trump made the protocol-breaking call to congratulate Tsai on her recent election (although he later tweeted out that it was Tsai who had actually called him).China and Taiwan are on especially shaky ground at the moment, as Tsai is known for her opposition to a unified China, while the latter considers Taiwan a province. The Chinese made no secret that Taiwan's recent weapons deal with the US has been a source of much anger.
According to Trump’s transition office, both noted “the close economic, political and security ties between Taiwan and the United States.”
This led first to damage control from Trump running-mate Mike Pence, and then to China losing its normally calm disposition to the American leader-in-waiting’s unpredictability.
Though the US does not recognize Taiwan as a separate country, a 1979 law governing relations with the island obligates Washington to provide the government in Taipei with “sufficient self-defense capabilities” and come to its protection in case of a Chinese attack, according to the State Department.


JUST IN: President-elect Donald J. Trump asked Boeing to stop building a brand new 747 Air Force One.